Tier 2clinical_registryApprovedcorrectedev-au-aoanjrr-2024

AOANJRR 2024 Annual Report (25th edition)

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, SAHMRI

Earlier internal material attributed the 19 per cent and 30 per cent six-year revision advantage to table KT60 and to Mako. KT60 is the all-robotic-systems comparison and shows no significant difference. The advantage belongs to KT66 and KT68, which are Triathlon CR specific, and the report never names Mako.

Summary

Data period to 31 December 2023, analysing 2,131,050 procedures. The registry's all-robotic-systems comparison finds no difference in adjusted revision rate between robotically assisted and non-technology-assisted primary total knee replacement, the same null result it reports for computer navigation, although there are fewer revisions for loosening and instability with robotic assistance. The Triathlon CR specific tables are the source of the 19.2 per cent (KT66, adjusted HR 0.86, p = 0.033) and 30.4 per cent with patella (KT68, adjusted HR 0.74, p = 0.001) six-year cumulative revision reductions carried in the audited summary. CY2023 volume was 78,125 knee, 58,529 hip and 10,141 shoulder, totalling 146,795.

Supporting location Data Snapshot 2023 (printed p.4); Knee Replacement chapter, Robotic Assistance section, tables KT60, KT66 and KT68

Open source

Published

—

Applicable from

31 Dec 2023

Accessed

27 Aug 2026

Answers depending on this record

No current answer cites this record.